|
|
Mr.C
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 785
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject: MonkeyWrenchers (Long) |
 |
|
|
The police will use ANY means to try and bring an activist group down ,,as many activist groups im sure would attest. Simple common sense will tell anyone they will never stop the anti-prohibition movement as a whole. So what they are left with is going after the groups that make the largest waves.
So Be Prepared. Lucky for us we have nothing to worry about. Well atleast until they take whats left of our constitution away. But thats another story for another time.
===========
A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching
POLICE UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS (1)
by "Mollie Maguire"
Undercover police activity has become a standard feature of the contemporary political terrain. Disclosures in recent years indicate that environmentalist, anti-nuclear, and animal rights groups are likely to be targeted for surreptitious investigation. This can take many forms, from an inconspicuous stranger who turns up to help at a demonstration, to a trained "deep cover" operative who may spend yeras working inside a target organization. These operations can be launched locally by a police or sheriff's department, or by any of a number of federal agencies, such as the Forest Service, which now has the third largest law enforcement staff in the federal government.
Another major source of inside information for investigators is the "CI" or "confidential informant." These informers can be private citizens recruited to infiltrate a group, or fearful members who turn on their friends (usually to save themselves). Without the existence of the CI, or "snitch," there would in fact be very few arrests made for major crimes. However, CIs do have major shortcomings from a police perspective, including their general unreliability, questionable status as testifying witnesses, and frequent refusal to testify in open court. Therefore, the information garnered from a CI must be backed up by the testimony of undercover police officers or supplemented by intensive police investigation (which may involve surveillance and the use of search warrants) to build a case without putting the informer on the witness stand. In fact, the use of a CI in an arrest is usually not revealed, so the investigation may appear to be nothing more than competent police work.
Any monkeywrencher who suspects surveillance, should examine associated, study who has access to information now believed to be in the hands of the police, notice anyone who suddenly attempts to distance themselves, and be alert to any other indication that investigators are receiving inside information.
The Undercover Infiltrator
Both government agencies and private companies are routinely involved in running undercover operations. Small police departments and private firms (ranging from the large agencies like Pinkerton and Burns down to the security divisions maintained by large corporations and often staffed by formerl law enforcement agents) typically rely on the solitary agent to ferret out information which is then passed on to the agent's supervisors. Larger state and Federal agencies have the resources to mount far more extensive infiltration efforts. Major efforts entail a team approach, with extensive backup equipment and personnel to exploit the information provided by the undercover cop. The team's job is to protect the undercover agent and assemble a mass of evidence so tht a subsequent prosecution doesn't rely entirely on the testimony of one officer.
The increasing sophistication of undercover operations has made it more difficult to spot these people. Today's undercover officer can look and sound like anyone. Many years ago, an undercover cop might be exposed when suspicious associates pilfered his phone bill from a mailbox and found that it listed numerous calls to a recognizable police phone number. Those days are gone as the quality and training of undercover operatives has improved. Only the crudest attempts to infiltrate, such as those occurring at demonstrations or other well-publicized events, are likely to be obvious due to the appearance or demeanor of the plainclothes officer.
There are two broad categories of undercover operative: deep cover and light cover.
A deep cover operative "lives" the role. It may be someone with extensive experience in undercover work, or a young person selected from an academy training class. Novices are actually preferred sometimes because they have not acquired the typically authoritarian habits that might give them away as cops, and also because they are less likely to be recognized by regular cops in the field who might unknowingly reveal their identity in a chance encounter.
Deep cover operations are tightly compartmentalized within the investigating agency to prevent breaches of security or leaks by employees sympathetic to the group being infiltrated. These operations may be coordinated from isolated offices at training facilities like the FBI's Quantico Academy or the Federal law enforcement training academy (western branch at Marana, Arizona).
A deep cover agent is equipped with a false ID (usually retaining the real first name so she doesn't forget to respond to her name), and a skeleton of personal history, such as a business owner who will verify that so-and-so worked for them (and who will later notify the police that someone was inquiring). The agent's background may be kept close to the truth to prevent slip-ups. Finally, a deep-cover agent may work a real job, rent a house or apartment, and live the role 24 hours a day.
An undercover cop working under "light" cover may also have a false ID, but will most likely go home to his family and "real" life (usually in another city). Sometimes narcotics officers and other specially trained agents will be called on for these assignments.
Going Undercover
Most undercover infiltrations begin when the operative presents herself as a willing volunteer and joins the targeted organization. Often a confidential information is used to introduce the infiltrator to the group so that she will be more readily accepted. The CI may then discreetyl drop from the scene.
A high priority target organization may have a number of CIs and undercover operatives working at once, usually unknown to each other. Such multiple infiltration is used to test the veracity of the information provided.
Undercover agents may also assume roles outside the target organization but designed to provide inside access. A favorite is to pass themselves off as "writers" or members of the news media, or even as someone hoping to produce a documentary for public access television. A phony photographer or video camera crew will enhance the look of authenticity and make a record of people and actions for later use in identification and prosecution. This approach, when used at public gatherings, provides better quality information and photos than the old method of concealing surveillance cameras inside nearby buildings or parked vans. These undercover officers may also use this role to seek "confidential" interviews with monkeywrenchers and other underground activists. One of the CIs in the Arizona Five case played this role.
Another widely used undercover role is that of a utility worker or phone company repair person. This approach is valuable for obtaining access to a suspect's living quarters or workplace. While inside, the officer can plant listening devices, size up the security measures for a later "break-in," or look for evidence of illegality that can be used to obtain a search warrant. If the suspect is a renter, the landlord's cooperation may be sought to obtain legal access without a warrant, to provide nearby facilities for surveillance, or to provide cover for an undercover officer who may act as a handyman or building superintendent. If you rent, you should go out of your way to remain on good terms with your landlord. Even if your landlord doesn't tip you off to police inquiries, a sudden change in her behavior around you could alert you that something has happened to change her opinion of you, and that "something" just might be sudden police interest in you. The same rule applies to neighbors, employers, and coworkers. The people around you every day can provide the first warning of danger.
If utility company workers come to your door seeking access and you didn't request service, you should request some ID first, and then call their office to verify their identity and their reasons for requesting entry. Look up the phone number yourself, since the number they provide could be as phony as their ID card. However, remember also that acting unduly suspicious might cause a bona fide repair person to wonder just what you might have to hide.
Yet another undercover role is that of the phony "lawyer" who contacts a suspect before the shock of arrest wears off in an effort to elicit information. This person may claim to be a lawyer, or may just use subterfuge to create this impression. You can, of course, ask for some ID such as a state bar membership card. The period immediately after arrest is a dangerous time. Even after you take on an authentic lawyer to represent you, you may want time to think about your situation before deciding how straightforward you want to be with your attorney. Contrary to the old adage, it is not necessarily essential that your lawyer know everything. For instance, your lawyer may not need to know that you're guilty, just that you intend to plead innocent.
Similar to the phony lawyer approach is that of the fake court official. This person may ask you for a statement or ask you to fill out a form (to be used for handwriting comparison). If someone like this approaches you, verify the person's identity before doing anything else.
If you are in jail, the prisoner sharing your cell may be an undercover operative, usually a "jail-house snitch" who routinely seeks information for the authorities from talkative prisoners. Finally, the prosecution may attempt to place an informant in your legal defense committee.
Undercover Tactics
The first task of an undercover infiltrator is to gain unquestioning acceptance within the group. Often she will play it cool, do volunteer work, and bide her time, awaiting opportunity.
The goal of undercover cops is to identify suspects and gather evidence for prosecution. They may volunteer for any job, just to widen their access to information. Often they seek clerical or leadership roles to extend their influence and gain access to membership and contribution records. When the FBI was working to suppress the American Indian Movement, they had an undercover agent working as AIM's head of security.
Sometimes, undercover agents may go beyond the identification of suspects and the gathering of evidence: they may actually encourage someone to participate in an illegal act, and then help the police set up the arrest of that person or persons (the classic "agent provocateur"). Don't make the mistake of thinking that this sort of thing is only found in spy novels, or went out of style with the demise of the Czarist secret police. There is a good deal of evidence to suggest that the decline of a number of radical groups in the U.S. in the 1960s and early 70s was speeded up by the judicious use of agents provocateurs (as well as simple informants) by both Federal and local police agencies. The undercover FBI agent in the Arizona Five case went so far with being a provocateur in his desperation to make a case, that he warned his supervisor that he had "an entrapment problem."
One way these agents try to spot potential monkeywrenchers they can set up for arrest is to act especially radical and "talk tough" when around other members of the group. If someone responds, the agent will then provide ideas, information, or equipment to the monkeywrencher(s) to encourage specific illegal acts which can later result in arrests. Such agents may brag of having participated in numerous illegal acts, in order to attract recruits. In early 1989, a story unfolded about the infiltration of animal rights and environmental organizations by several undercover operatives. In this case, the agents were apparently employed by a private security company whose clients included corporations under attack by animal rights activists for their abuse of laboratory animals. In one incident, these agents appear to have helped engineer an attempted bombing in which an animal rights activist was arrested. According to Ecomedia Bulletin, a Toronto anarchist publication, one agent (Mary Lou Sapone) was on the mailing lists of numerous animal rights and environmental groups, including Earth First!.
Michael Faine, the FBI undercover agent, and several confidential informants in the infamous Arizona Five set-up, are classic examples of the above types of infiltrators.
The most valuable information an undercover agent can obtain includes admissions of guilt and plans for future raids. The agent will often seek to record this information for later presentation in court. The basic way to do this is to "wear a wire," either a small transmitter or a recording device concealed on her person. If this is deemed too risky, the agent may try to arrange an incriminating conversation in a car or room that has been bugged in advance. Any such recording is completely legal, requiring no warrant, as long as one party present (the undercover cop) consents to allow the recording. When preselected locations are used to stage an incriminating session, hidden video camers using tiny "pinhole" lenses which are nearly impossible to spot may be used to make a record of non-verbal, but possibly incriminating evidence, such as the nod of a head, or the passing of a written communication.
Electronic recording has become so common that often police agents questioning suspects openly will wear small recording devices.
If a suspect makes an incriminating statement in the presence of an agent when not under electronic surveillance, the undercover agent may then try to arrange a second incriminating conversation at a time and place when it can be recorded. Note: Contrary to popular myth, an undercover cop does not have to admit being a cop if confronted with the accusation.
Undercover operatives enjoy logistical support that greatly expands their ability to gather evidence. In addition to sophisticated electronics, they often use a wide variety of vehicles (usually confiscated) to allow unobtrusive surveillance.
Measures taken against suspects fingered by an undercover operative include the following:
Physical surveillance of a suspect and her residence, which will continue during nighttime and other times when illegal actions are more likely to occur.
Video surveillance of a residence by cameras hidden in parked vehicles or nearby buildings. Remote video surveillance has become especially popular in rural areas where the physical presence of officers may stand out. Cameras may be hidden in brush and trees, with coaxial cables run to a monitoring post (perhaps in a neighbor's house).
Trash may be searched for incriminating items, names, and addresses of associated, financial records, records of travel, etc. Trash may be either directly retrieved from the suspect's trash can, or retrieved later from the trash truck after normal pickup.
A "pen register" may be installed on the suspect's phone line. This device makes a record of all phone numbers dialed but does not record conversations. Such a record may be useful in establishing a pattern of calling associated with illegal actions, and in establishing a suspect's associates. Undercover agents, wanting to frame a leader with whom have limited contact, will encourage an individual against whom they have incriminating recordings to phone the leader merely to establish evidence of contact in an effort to support conspiracy charges against the leader.
Bank records may be scrutinized for signs of travel or incriminating purchases. These records sometimes may be secured unofficially, through the "good-old-boy" network, since many former law enforcement personnel end up in bank security posts.
Utility company records may be checked. These might show valuable information, such as a drop in power usage which might indicate a prolonged absence at a key time.
Authority to conduct "mail cover" may be secured from postal authorities. This involves the recording of all the information on the outside of letters and packages (without opening them to check the contents).
A "bumper beeper" may be secured to the underside of a suspect's vehicle with wire or magnets. Such a device allows surveillance vehicles to track the suspects movements from a safe distance so as not to betray the agents' presence.
Note that none of the above investigative methods requires a warrant. If the police can develop sufficient information (usually just a "pattern" of suspicious behavior) they can then obtain warrants for more invasive methods, such as phone taps, hidden microphones, and opening of mail. The FBI has very good success at getting permission from federal judges to install phone taps and room bugs based on elaborate and often fanciful conspiracy theories.
END PART ONE
===
i lost the link that i got this from..sorry
Last edited by Mr.C on Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:32 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr.C
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 785
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
POLICE UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS (2)
by "Mollie Maguire"
Private Undercover Operations
When private investigative agencies infiltrate a radical group, they usually assign operatives with little training, sent out on a "fishing expedition" to pass along any and all information on the activities of the target group. More experienced operatives may have a background in employee investigations and are generally "hired" by an established business to pose as an average employee while actually seeking information about theft, drug use, union activity, or anything else of interest to management.
Private operatives may use their real identities or fabricated ones. They routinely provide written reports to their employers to justify their job. Because they are not law enforcement officers, they are more likely to instigate or provoke others to commit illegal acts (such as the recent case involving animal rights activists alluded to above), conduct illegal searches and surveillance, and generally engage in the kinds of actions whose evidence would not be admissable in court. Private operatives typically lack the costly support systems of police undercover agents, and can be more readily exposed.
These private undercover operatives have been repeatedly used against the environment, anti-nuclear, and animals rights movements.
Confidential Informants
The confidential informant, or "CI," is possibly the single most valuable tool used in law enforcement. CIs are obtained by a number of means:
Walk-in. These are disgruntled or disenchanted members of a target organization who volunteer their services, for a variety of reasons. They may have joined a group with good intentions, only to become offended by what they see as overly radical tactics. Or they may be ambitious people who have been passed over for leadership roles [sic] and decide to seek revenge against those they think slighted them. Or they may be wackos who seek revenge against someone in the group for personal reasons, including romantic ones.
Tip-offs. The future CI is indiscreet in talking of illegal exploits, and is overheard by someone not of the group, who in turn informs police. The police approach the future CI, and are able to persuade her to "roll over."
Deal-makers. Someone who is arrested on a serious charge may try to avoid prosecution, or obtain a lighter sentence by agreeing to infiltrate a group to obtain information about other illegal activities. This often occurs with drug busts.
Recruits. Known members of a target group may be targeted for recruitment by the police. The effort usually begins with a background check for signs of vulnerability. An individual who appears "weak" might simply be interviewed repeatedly by a persuasive officer until she agrees to cooperate. A conservative employer, perhaps one with a law enforcement or military background, might be enlisted to help in pressuring the prospective recruit. In the past, for instance, the FBI has used interviews with employers to intimidate members of political groups.
Similarly, a spouse may be approached to aid in the recruitmen. Veiled threats to children or to one's job security have often proved effective. Also, the parents of the would-be informer may be approached to secure their help. This approach may be particularly effective if the subject is, say, a college student receiving financial support from her parents.
People who have never been arrested, or young people heavily influenced by their families, are often more susceptible to becoming CIs than those with more experience.
Defense Against Undercover Activities
The danger posed by CIs can be lessened by observing the following rules:
Always use the basic "need-to-know" rule. This means that each member of a monkeywrenching team needs only the information necessary to carry out her specific task. Ideally, only one member of a monkeywrenching group needs to know the target in advance, and the others are informed en route to the target. In such cases, be suspicious of someone who suddenly has to make a phone call after learning the target or other plans. Obviously, it is not always possible to operate this way. In many operations, it is necessary that participants be widely scattered (lookouts, for instance) and have detailed knowledge of the terrain. Suffice it to say that such operations should only be undertaken by small groups of people who have known each other for years and have previously operated together.
Never belittle a fellow activist or excessively criticize their errors. Everyone makes mistakes. People who are unnecessarily embarrassed may become resentful and vengeful.
If someone expresses doubt about certain actions, don't involve her in those types of actions. If she has serious reservations, "ease" her out of the monkeywrenching group, but try to remain friends. Cutting her off completely may destroy bonds of personal loyalty and make it easier for her to inform on you.
If you have reason to believe that police pressure has been stepped up, lay low for awhile. Your increased vulnerability at such times could provide the authorities with recruitment opportunities.
Be wary of someone who suddenly drops out after introducing a new member. The new member may be an undercover cop.
If a member of the group is contacted by the police, for whatever reason, that member has an obligation to inform the group leader or organizer. The contact may be the first warning of a recruitment attempt.
Be wary of any group member arrested on unrelated criminal charges, such as drugs. Such persons might have incentive to make a deal for their freedom.
Have no contact with the so-called "criminal element." Such circles teem with informers. A radical animals rights activist was once busted after buying explosives from a member of an "outlaw" motorcycle gang.
Be wary of "lost souls," mentally-disturbed individuals (sometimes it takes awhile to realize that someone doesn't have all her oars in the water), or other people you feel sorry for and might therefore try to be friends with. The CIs in the Arizona Five case were all people whom folks in Arizona Earth First! pitied.
Double Agents
Be especially cautious when dealing with people who volunteer inside information from their position in the offending company, agency, or the like. Such people may be sincerely on your side, and if so, their information can be extremely valuable. But it is also possible that such people, particularly if they approach you first, are "double agents." A double agent will, udner the pretext of helping your group, actually give you misleading information that can be harmful. Such a person may even try to set the group up for an arrest.
If you have such a "volunteer" and you think she might be useful to you, reduce the risk to any actual monkeywrenchers by dealing with her through an intermediary, who serves as contact person. The contact should be someone you know well and are sure is on your side, but who has never participated in illegal actions, and who has on intention of ever doing so. The contact serves as a "cut-out," passing on information from the volunteer informant and providing a protective layer between the informant and the action group.
It is important that information only flow in one direction, from the informant to the action group. The informant, no matter how helpful, should never be told of plans or actions by the action group. This also protects the informant, in case of investigation by police or company officials. For this reason, you never make any written record of the informant's identity, lest this fall into the authorities' hands.
Because your contact person is exposed to the threat of arrest (especially if the informant really is a double agent planning a set-up) she must be mature and emotionally stable enough to stand up under interrogation to protect the identity of the action group.
If you have any reason to suspect that your informant is a double agent planning a set-up, arrange to secretly tape-record meetings between your contact and the informer, in which the informant can be caught making provocative statements designed to incite illegal action. Such a recording could be quite valuable in the defense of anyone charged with a monkeywrenching offense. However, any such tapes (or other evidence) should never be kept at home where police could use a warrant to seize and destroy them. Remote rural burial is perhaps the most secure option, so long as you encase the tapes in several layers of water-tight plastic bags.
Your contact should have solid alibis at the time of any action. Being in a public place where others will be able to provide later verification is a good way; being verifiably out of town is even better.
The contact should be very careful when passing information on to the action group. A pay phone to pay phone call, arranged at the last minute, is generally secure. Face-to-face meetings in open areas like parks are also usually secure from electronic eavesdropping. Pass information on verbally, making no written notes that can be seized as evidence, and on a strictly one-to-one basis. If confronted, denials will be more convincing if the content of a conversation hinges on one person's word against another's. Another precaution is for the contact to pass on information as if it were idle conversation or gossip. If no illegal activity is actually discussed, it will be harder to prove that a crime has been committed.
Because legal, above-ground political organizations are most susceptible to infiltration by undercover officers, serious monkeywrenchers should not be involved in such groups, pariticularly those with militant reputations or believed to be sympathetic to monkeywrenching.
Exposing Undercover Agents
When dealing with a suspected undercover agent, be patient. Undercover agents can be very costly, and if they don't produce results, they may be discontinued or moved elsewhere. If an undercover agents fails to elicit any useful information after a considerable time, they may move on. Incidentally, beware of the person who move consistently from one area to another. She could be an undercover agent fishing for opportunities.
Baiting is one way to expose an undercover agent. The "suspect" is provided (seemingly inadvertently) with a bit of information so enticing that the authorities cannot resist acting on it. This could be the time, date, and place of a future action, or the location of some highly incriminating items. Of course, the action does not take place as planned, or the "incriminating items" are totally innocuous. If the suspected undercover agent is the only one provided with this information, and the police make the appropriate response, you have reasonable proof that the "suspect" is indeed an agent. If you have tipped the suspected informer to the details of a bogus action, you will need to have some method of spotting the resultant police surveillance or ambush without compromising anyone; perhaps you could have someone just walk by as an innocent pedestrian or hiker.
The baiting method can be used with more than one person at a time by providing each one with slightly different information (different locations, times, etc.) The response will indicate which person is passing information. Keep it simple!
Though undercover agents routinely participate in illegal actions to convince group members that they are bona fide, they are not generally allowed to instigate acts by their handlers for legal reasons. They sometimes break this rule, but doing so can weaken their case in court. If you want to "test" someone you suspect of being an undercover cop, you might provide her with the opportunity (and even materials) to commit an illegal act, but NO ENCOURAGEMENT. Use your imagination. A simple example would be something like this: With the suspected undercover agent in your car, park by a fur store. You have rocks, spray paint, quick drying glue, and the like in plain sight of the suspected agent. You ask her, "What do you think?" Let the person being tested totally instigate the action. If the person does propose to do something illegal, and is an agent, she has entrapped you by instigating the crime. However, in such a situation, most agents will try to make an excuse for inaction, perhaps belittling the scale of the action or promising more later. Beware of this person in the future. (Don't give a suspected agent the opportunity to run to a pay phone before deciding what to do; she might try to contact her supervisor for instructions.) Note: An undercover agent may risk commmitting entrapment on one action in order to insinuate herself with the group to get the "goods" on them for a later, more serious caper.
Remember that undercover agents usually "wear a wire" to record conversations. If you really suspect someone of being an agent, and there is no way to keep the person out of a key meeting, you might consider "frisking" the people attending the meeting. Another method of detecting recording devices would be to use a small metal detector (such as are used by treasure hunters, and sold by companies like Radio Shack). However, in most situations this option is probably not feasible, since most people would highly resent such an invasive procedure, or consider it an affront to their loyalty. A better option would be to come up with an excuse for postponing the meeting, until you can check out the suspected agent by other means. Often an agent with have their recorder or a backup recorder in a day pack, purse, or briefcase. As long as the conversation takes place nearby (in the same room or vehicle, say) the recording is apt to be intelligible. In situations where undercover agents expect close personal or extended contact, such as a camping trip, exercise, or soaking in a hot tub, they may forego using a recording device lest they be discovered. (If anything incriminating is discussed while they are "unwired," they will refer back to the conversation later when they are recording, hoping to get the incriminating information on tape.) Or if they suspect they are suspected, they might manufacture a situation which "proves" they are not wired for sound.
Here are a few ways undercover agents may tip their hands:
Seeking information they do not need under "need to know" rules.
Trying to get people to repeat incriminating statements made at an earlier meeting (so they can be recorded). If you are suspicious, say you were just joking when you made the earlier remark.
Repeatedly casting suspicion on others without basis. This may be a smoke screen to keep suspicion off themselves.
Showing an extremely shallow understanding of the issues. An undercover cop may know only what she has been briefed on. Some, however, are good talkers and can sound knowledgeable without really knowing an issue in depth.
Making boisterous demands for action and belittling more timid members of the group. Because many cops have authoritarian, even violent personalities, they may reveal this inadvertently.
Showing extreme nervousness, such as looking around constantly during an action. (They may be looking for the surveillance or backup team).
Slipping away to phone or meet supervisors or control agents. Such meetings may be brief, in a car at a public parking lot, for instance, or in a department store. Longer meetings, such as "debriefings" might be held in motel rooms.
Constantly "managing" the conversation to guide it in directions they wish.
Mentioning another person's name when you refer obliquely to that person. (For the record, since the agent is probably recording the conversation; likewise the next two).
Working the time, date, or location into conversations.
Explicitly stating incriminating things in response to vague comments from you or others.
Manipulating conversations to try to get some kind of affirmation from you in response to their incriminating statements.
Regularly asking about other individuals (particularly supposed leaders).
Initiating conversations about monkeywrenching.
Steering a conversation back to illegal acts or conspiracies when the conversation moves on to legal and unrelated matters.
Claiming to be a recovering alcoholic. This gives them excuses not to drink with you and possibly slip up on their covers while under the influence.
Playing different roles with different people calculated to appeal specifically to each individual's vulnerabilities or strengths. An infiltrator may play the role of just the kind of person you need in your current mental state.
Setting-up a phony "hit" to enhance their credibility. They may arrange to attack heavy equipment, surveyor stakes, or other targets while witnessed by people they wish to entrap or whose confidence they want.
Remember that a typical way for a professional undercover agent to initially contact a suspect (group or individual) is to be introduced by a non-professional informer already known but not suspected by the suspect(s).
END PART TWO |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
socrateez
Moderator
Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 1373
Location: I'm your next door neighbor
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nice read! Who is the author? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr.C
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 785
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: Re: MonkeyWrenchers (Long) |
|
|
|
| Mr.C wrote: |
END PART ONE
===
i lost the link that i got this from..sorry |
by "Mollie Maguire"  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
socrateez
Moderator
Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 1373
Location: I'm your next door neighbor
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I just reread that somewhere else! There is some very valuable info in there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
C.W.
Antiprohibitionist
Joined: 09 Dec 2008
Posts: 16
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
socrateez
Moderator
Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 1373
Location: I'm your next door neighbor
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| welcome to the forum1 Thank you for those archive links. That information is some of the best compiled so far on the web. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group |
|
|
|
